ISSN (Online): 1694-4674
  1. Home
  2. Volume 04 (2025), Version 9
  3. Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in a Patient with Severe Lumbar Scoliosi…
Case Report Open Access

Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in a Patient with Severe Lumbar Scoliosis and Large Proximal Ureteric Calculi

, , , ,
Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences Volume 04 (2025), Version 9 August 12, 2025 pp. 887 - 889 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17061008
Abstract

This case report outlines the effective management and outcome of a 26 years old male patient with lumbar scoliosis and multiple large left ureteric calculi with moderate hydronephrosis. The patient visited the outpatient urology department with a complaint of left flank pain persisting for four months. Imaging revealed multiple large stones in the left proximal ureter, with the largest measuring over 3 cm. Because of the anatomical complexities associated with severe lumbar scoliosis and the significant stone burden, the patient was not an ideal candidate for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL). Instead, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was successfully performed, yielding favorable results. This report examines the surgical approach, challenges, and benefits of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison to other treatment options, including percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open ureterolithotomy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and laser lithotripsy.

References
  1. Matlaga BR, Jansen JP, Meckley LM, Byrne TW, Lingeman JE. Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Urol. 2012;188(1):130-137.
  2. Ramachandra P, Palazzi KL, Holmes NM, Chiang G. Children with spinal abnormalities have an increased health burden from upper tract urolithiasis. Urology. 2014;83(6):1378-82.
  3. Guler Y, Erbin A, Kafkasli A, Ozmerdiven G. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(1):51–6.
  4. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74. [PubMed]
  5. Türk C, Skolarikos A, Neisius A, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. EAU, 2019: 289– 220. Available at http://uroweb.org/guide line/urolithiasis/. Accessed October 2019.
  6. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. Guidelines on Urolithiasis [Internet]. European Association of Urology; 2020. https:// uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/#3. Accessed 3 Dec 2020.
  7. He Z, Zhang C, Zeng G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided by ultrasonography to treat upper urinary tract calculi complicated with severe spinal deformity. IBJU. 2016;42(5):960–6.
  8. Al-Sayyad A. et al.: Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stones. Urol Ann.. 2012, 4:34-37. 10.4103/0974-7796.91619
  9. Abdel Raheem A, Alowidah I, Hagras A, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stones: Surgical technique, outcomes and literature review. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020;1–9
  10. Shadpour P, Modaresi SS, Maghsoudi R, Roohinezhad R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stone: A review article. World J ClinUrol 2014; 3(3): 336-339
Author Resources