ISSN (Online): 1694-4674
  1. Home
  2. Volume 04 (2025), Version 13
  3. Clinical Significance and Variations of Fetal Frontomaxillary Facial A…
Original Article Open Access

Clinical Significance and Variations of Fetal Frontomaxillary Facial Angle Measurement in North Indian Pregnant Females

, , , , , ,
Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences Volume 04 (2025), Version 13 November 25, 2025 pp. 1468 - 1474
182 60
Download PDF
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to establish normative reference ranges for FMF angle measurements in North Indian fetuses during first trimester (11-13+6 weeks of gestation) and assess its clinical significance. Design: A prospective observational study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, involving 161 North Indian pregnant females. Methods: Transabdominal ultrasound measurements of FMF angle were obtained using standardized mid-sagittal imaging techniques. The relationship between FMF angle and crown-rump length (CRL), gestational age, and maternal factors was analyzed using statistical models. Results: The mean FMF angle was 83.90° (SD = 1.76°), with a range of 80.0° to 87.3°. A strong inverse correlation was observed between FMF angle and CRL (r = -0.789, p <.001), confirming a gestational age-dependent decline. No significant influence of maternal age (p =.574) or gravida status (p =.233) was found on FMF angle measurements. The 5th to 95th percentile reference range for FMF angle was established as 81.3° to 86.5°, providing a clinically relevant baseline for North Indian populations. Conclusion: FMF angle is a stable and reproducible prenatal screening parameter in North Indian pregnancies. The study establishes normative data essential for refining regional first- trimester screening protocols and improving early detection of fetal anomalies.

References
  1. Mangla, Mishu; Kumar, Naina: First Trimester Ultrasound Soft Markers in a Fetus: Genetic Associations and Diagnostic Implications. Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 2025, 40:1-12. 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000301
  2. Raniga S, Desai PD, Parikh H.: Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?. MedGenMed. 2006, 8(1):9:8(1):9.
  3. Jiri Sonek, Marisa Borenstein, Themistoklis Dagklis, Nicola Persico, Kypros H. Nicolaides,: Frontomaxillary facial angle in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11-13(6) weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 196:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.891
  4. S Pranpanus 1, O Kor-anantakul, T Suntharasaj, C Suwanrath, R Leetanaporn, T Hanprasertpong, N Pruksanusak.: Frontomaxillary facial angle in chromosomally normal Thai foetuses at 11 to 13 weeks 6 days ’ gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016, 36:53-7. 10.3109/01443615.2015.1030598.
  5. Alphonse J, Cox J, Clarke J, Schluter P, McLennan A: The Effect of Ethnicity on 2D and 3D Frontomaxillary Facial Angle Measurement in the First Trimester. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013, 2013:10.1155/2013/847293
  6. W. Plasencia, T. Dagklis, A. Sotiriadis, M. Borenstein, K. H. Nicolaides: Frontomaxillary facial angle at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation—reproducibility of measurements. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2006, 29:18-21. 10.1002/uog.3907
  7. Czuba B, Cnota W, Wloch A, Wegrzyn P, Sodowski K, Wielgos M, Borowski D: Frontomaxillary facial angle measurement in screening for trisomy 18 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of pregnancy: a double-centre study. Biomed Res Int. 2013, 2013:1-4. 10.1155/2013/168302
  8. M Borenstein, N Persico, T Dagklis, E Faros, K H Nicolaides: Frontomaxillary facial angle in fetuses with trisomy 13 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2007, 30:818-823. 10.1002/uog.5135
  9. R. Lachmann, G. Picciarelli, J. Moratalla, N. Greene, K. H. Nicolaides: Frontomaxillary facial angle in fetuses with spina bifida at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2010, 36:268-271. 10.1002/uog.7718
  10. C. Hsiao: Frontomaxillary facial angle in the normal and trisomy 21 at 11 and 13 + 6 weeks gestation in Asian population. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2011, 38:186. 10.1002/uog.9678
  11. F Molina, N Persico, M Borenstein, J Sonek, K H Nicolaides: Frontomaxillary facial angle in trisomy 21 fetuses at 16-24 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2008, 31:384-387. 10.1002/uog.5288
  12. M. BORENSTEIN, N. PERSICO, I. STROBL, J. SONEK and K. H. NICOLAIDES: Frontomaxillary and mandibulomaxillary facial angles at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in fetuses with trisomy 18. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2007, 30: 928-933. 10.1002/uog.5188
  13. Roshan Jabeen, Karthika P: Updated socioeconomic classification: revised modified B. G. Prasad and modified Kuppuswamy scales for January 2025. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2025, 12:2103. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20251038
  14. C. H. Hsiao, C. L. Lin, C. F. Hsieh: Frontomaxillary facial angle in normal fetuses at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in an oriental population. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2008, 32:310. 10.1002/uog.5613
  15. Ana Paula Nascimento Panigassi, Edward Araujo Júnior, Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza, Antonio Fernandes Moron & David Baptista da Silva Pares: Fetal frontomaxillary facial angle between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation in a Brazilian population: influence of different races. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2013, 26: 1116-1120. 10.3109/14767058.2013.771164
  16. Jakub Staniczek, Maisa Manasar-Dyrbuś, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska, Adrianna Kondracka, Dominika Orszulak: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between young maternal age and fetal abnormalities. Sci Rep. 2024, 14:10.1038/s41598-024-74015-1
Author Resources